Are you looking for an AI-based note-taking assistant? Jamy and Read are two popular options, but each has specific features that make it more suitable depending on your needs. Here’s a quick summary:

• Jamy: Ideal if you value privacy, customization, and versatility. It works online and offline, supports multiple platforms (including phone calls), and allows you to customize meeting templates.

• Read: Perfect for teams needing sentiment analysis, automated summaries, and interaction metrics. It focuses on online meetings and offers advanced integrations with business tools.

Quick Comparison

// Paste a code snippet
import { motion } from "framer-motion";

function Component() {
    return (
        <motion.div
            transition={{ ease: "linear" }}
            animate={{ rotate: 360, scale: 2 }}
        />
    );
}

Quick Conclusion: If you need flexibility and control over your meetings, Jamy is for you. If you prefer detailed analysis and automation, choose Read.

Related YouTube Video

Main Features

Meeting Transcription Quality

Jamy offers accurate transcriptions for online meetings, in-person gatherings, and phone calls, covering the needs of teams working across different communication channels.

On the other hand, Read combines automated transcriptions with sentiment analysis. As Sanduni, content editor for growth, mentions:

"Read AI is a well-known player in the AI-driven productivity space... The tool is designed to provide real-time transcription, sentiment analysis, action item detection, and AI-driven insights".

Both tools stand out for their ability to accurately record information, which directly impacts organization and task tracking.

Task Management

Although both platforms allow for task identification and management, their approaches present key differences:

// Paste a code snippet
import { motion } from "framer-motion";

function Component() {
    return (
        <motion.div
            transition={{ ease: "linear" }}
            animate={{ rotate: 360, scale: 2 }}
        />
    );
}

Platform Compatibility

Jamy’s ability to operate across multiple platforms makes it a versatile tool for teams using different environments. According to studies, over 50% of users participate in meetings across various platforms.

Jamy is compatible with:

• Zoom

• Microsoft Teams

• Google Meet

• Webex

• Phone Calls

Read, on the other hand, supports:

• Zoom

• Microsoft Teams

• Google Meet

• In-person Meetings

The ability to include phone calls in Jamy expands its usefulness for teams with more diverse needs.

Customization Options

Meeting Templates from Jamy

Jamy stands out by offering an advanced system that allows you to create specific templates for each type of meeting. This is particularly useful for teams managing varied formats, such as interviews or follow-up sessions.

Jamy's templates include:

// Paste a code snippet
import { motion } from "framer-motion";

function Component() {
    return (
        <motion.div
            transition={{ ease: "linear" }}
            animate={{ rotate: 360, scale: 2 }}
        />
    );
}

A key detail is how the description serves as a prompt for the artificial intelligence. According to the official documentation:

"Think of the 'description' as a customized prompt for Jamy, meaning you should include any detail you want to see in the summary. Imagine that Jamy is your assistant who needs to know what to note and what to omit".

On the other hand, Read takes a more automated approach, with fewer manual customization options.

Read Configuration

Read offers the following functionalities:

• Customizable coaching metrics.

• Automated recommendations to improve interaction.

• Tracking of key topics and tasks.

• Detailed performance analysis.

While Jamy allows users to define the structure and format of reports, Read focuses on automating the generation of insights. Its “For You” page provides tracking of topics and tasks, albeit with less control over report customization.

The main difference lies in that Jamy allows users to decide how to structure and present information, while Read prioritizes automated analysis and recommendations to improve performance.

Tool Integrations

Jamy Connection Options

Jamy employs custom webhooks to automate processes in productivity tools. Among the most used integrations are:

// Paste a code snippet
import { motion } from "framer-motion";

function Component() {
    return (
        <motion.div
            transition={{ ease: "linear" }}
            animate={{ rotate: 360, scale: 2 }}
        />
    );
}

As of April 2024, integrations with Trello and Monday allow for automatic transformation of detected tasks into cards and project items.

"Integrate tasks with your favorite productivity tools. Turn tasks from Jamy into cards and items in Trello and Monday with just one click".

Read Platform Connections

On the other hand, Read offers direct integration with various systems to synchronize data automatically:

• CRM Systems: HubSpot and Salesforce

• Collaboration Tools: Confluence, Jira, and Notion

• Calendars: Google Calendar, Outlook 365, and Zoom Calendar

• Documentation: Google Docs and Microsoft OneNote

Automation Comparison

Both platforms approach automation in different ways:

// Paste a code snippet
import { motion } from "framer-motion";

function Component() {
    return (
        <motion.div
            transition={{ ease: "linear" }}
            animate={{ rotate: 360, scale: 2 }}
        />
    );
}

The choice will depend on the applications your team uses. Jamy is ideal for focusing on project management, while Read offers greater compatibility with enterprise systems. These differences highlight how each tool adapts to different work environments, something that will be reflected in content management below.

Language Support

Jamy's Language Features

Jamy is capable of automatically identifying over 28 languages and offers full support for 15 of them. Its advanced speaker recognition system ensures accurate transcriptions, even in conversations where multiple languages are mixed.

"I have used different meeting assistants, but Jamy has worked best for me in terms of language switching. I work with clients who speak both Spanish and English, and Jamy automatically detects the call's language and creates the meeting report in the correct language. This is super important for multilingual teams!"

Read's Language Options

Read includes functionalities such as:

• Automated meeting transcriptions

• Generation of complete summaries

• Translation between Spanish and English

Features for Global Teams

These tools bring clear benefits for teams operating in different languages. Some data support the importance of multilingual support:

// Paste a code snippet
import { motion } from "framer-motion";

function Component() {
    return (
        <motion.div
            transition={{ ease: "linear" }}
            animate={{ rotate: 360, scale: 2 }}
        />
    );
}

Comparison between Jamy and Read

Below are the key differences between both platforms:

// Paste a code snippet
import { motion } from "framer-motion";

function Component() {
    return (
        <motion.div
            transition={{ ease: "linear" }}
            animate={{ rotate: 360, scale: 2 }}
        />
    );
}

Content Management

Jamy's File Structure

Jamy organizes files into easy-to-understand folders designed for you to find what you need without knowing exactly where it is. It also offers customizable tags that allow you to classify meetings according to your preferences.

What stands out:

• Hierarchically organized folders.

• Tags you can adjust to your needs.

• Automatic extraction of quotes with timestamps.

• Automatic summaries that provide context.

Read's File System

On the other hand, Read uses artificial intelligence to automatically classify meetings into predefined categories. It also gives you the option to create your own categories based on your needs.

// Paste a code snippet
import { motion } from "framer-motion";

function Component() {
    return (
        <motion.div
            transition={{ ease: "linear" }}
            animate={{ rotate: 360, scale: 2 }}
        />
    );
}

Search Functions

The search tools show clear differences between both systems:

| Feature | Jamy | Read | | --- | --- | | Tag Search | Configurable to your needs. | Automated. | | Web/Slack Search | Available on both platforms. | Only available on the web. | | Criteria | Context and time. | Titles and topics. | | Classification | Manual and assisted. | Fully automated. |

"Everyone knows and understands folders, so why complicate life by switching to SuiteFiles? Keep the folders and you won't have to learn how metadata works." - Andrew Sims, co-founder and CEO of SuiteFiles

Jamy also manages large amounts of data, allowing for efficient handling of thousands of participants per room. These functionalities demonstrate how both systems adapt to different ways of working.

Conclusion

Ideal Use for Jamy

Jamy is perfect for companies that need:

• Privacy and Compliance: Designed for organizations working with sensitive data.

• Versatility: Works well in both online and in-person meetings.

• Customization Options: Adjustable templates for different types of meetings.

A highlighted example is Siemens Mobility, which has integrated Jamy into its daily processes. According to Madeline Wendler, Global Head of Products at Siemens Mobility:

"Spending the whole day in meetings, using Jamy as my personal AI assistant, can save us a person's resource and ensure that all important takeaways are captured".

Ideal Use for Read

Read is more suitable for teams looking for:

• Detailed analysis: Tools to assess engagement and sentiment analysis.

• Advanced search: The Search Copilot feature allows for immediate information retrieval.

These features highlight the key differences between both tools.

Feature Summary

The main functionalities of each tool are summarized in the following table:

// Paste a code snippet
import { motion } from "framer-motion";

function Component() {
    return (
        <motion.div
            transition={{ ease: "linear" }}
            animate={{ rotate: 360, scale: 2 }}
        />
    );
}

If you prioritize privacy, customization, and versatility, Jamy is the best choice. On the other hand, if you need more detailed analysis and advanced search functions, Read will be more suitable.

Related Blog Posts

• Comparison of note-taker Jamy vs Fireflies: Which is the best for your team?