Are you looking for a tool to take notes in meetings that easily integrates with other platforms? Here’s a quick summary:

• Read: Ideal for advanced meeting analysis and detailed metrics. It automatically connects to scheduled meetings and uses Zapier for more complex integrations. However, its direct integrations are limited (Slack).

• Tactiq: Perfect for real-time transcriptions without recording. It offers native integrations with over 10 platforms (Notion, Salesforce, Slack, among others) and one-click task automation.

Quick Comparison:

Quick Conclusion: If you need extensive integrations and flexibility, Tactiq is the best choice. For detailed analysis and advanced metrics, go with Read.

Best AI Note Taking Apps 2024 (Otter vs EVERYTHING!)

What Read and Tactiq do

Below are the main features of each tool.

Main features of Read

Read acts as a meeting assistant that automatically connects to the user's scheduled sessions on their calendar. It uses artificial intelligence to generate transcriptions and detailed summaries, highlighting key aspects such as participation and sentiment during meetings.

Some of its standout features include:

• Advanced meeting analysis with detailed metrics.

• Automatic transcriptions that identify relevant topics.

• AI-based coaching capabilities.

"Improves meeting efficiency and optimizes collaboration with Read's AI-powered tools for meeting notes, metrics, coaching, and topic discovery" - Read AI.

On the other hand:

Main features of Tactiq

Tactiq excels in real-time transcription without the need to record, being used by over 700,000 users and managing more than 2 million meetings per month.

Its main features include:

• Customizable AI actions with one click.

• Ability to ask questions directly about the transcriptions.

• Automatic notifications to participants about the generated transcriptions.

"Tactiq's one-click AI actions have eliminated all the manual work I used to do. They are customizable and reusable, making my meeting workflows faster. Highly recommended for anyone with many virtual meetings" - Maria Shato, Project Manager.

Comparison of Key Features

The following table summarizes the key differences between both tools:

These features allow for analyzing how each tool adapts to different platforms, considering that over 50% of users participate in meetings through multiple video conferencing services.

Connections with Platforms

Compatible Applications and Services

The integration simplifies workflows. Tactiq connects directly with:

• Productivity tools: Confluence, Notion, and Quip.

• CRM platforms: HubSpot, Pipedrive, and Salesforce.

• Communication tools: Slack and Zoom.

• Project management: Linear.

On the other hand, Read primarily focuses on Slack for distributing notes.

These connections expand automation possibilities and enhance efficiency.

Automation Options

With Tactiq, one click allows you to automate tasks such as:

• Distributing transcriptions.

• Syncing information with the CRM.

• Automatically updating records.

Read, on the other hand, automates by automatically connecting to scheduled meetings and conducting post-analysis, utilizing Zapier to manage more complex tasks.

Below, a table compares the key integration functions between both tools.

Comparison of Integration Functions

These differences underscore the importance of choosing tools that integrate effectively with various video conferencing and productivity platforms.

Custom Settings

Read's Custom Options

Read offers limited customization options. Its main focus is on automating note-taking, leaving few possibilities for adjusting the format of transcriptions.

Tactiq's Custom Options

On the other hand, Tactiq provides more options for customization. One of its standout tools is Auto-correct, which allows adjusting the spelling of specific terms based on user needs. This feature is configured in Account and Settings > Settings > Auto-correct, where words and their corrections can be added. However, changes made only apply to future meetings.

Comparison of Customization Functions

The differences between the tools regarding customization are summarized in the following table:

These options allow teams to adjust tools according to their needs, improving the accuracy of transcriptions and facilitating their integration into complex workflows. The ability to customize terms and settings ensures that transcriptions are more useful and relevant for each case.

Language Support

Voice Recognition

Read offers a basic voice recognition system in over 20 languages. The accuracy of the recognition depends on factors such as audio quality, participant accents, and the use of technical terminology. Meanwhile, no specific information is available regarding language support in Tactiq.

Comparison of Linguistic Functions

While Read excels in compatibility with various languages, the lack of information on Tactiq makes a direct comparison difficult in this regard. The ability to work in multiple languages is particularly useful for optimizing international workflows, where accurate and comprehensible transcription in different languages is key.

Efficiently managing multiple languages facilitates customization and use in multinational environments, helping global teams make the most of their collaboration tools. This meets the demands of organizations operating internationally, where clear communication among teams speaking different languages is a crucial factor for success.

Technical Limitations

When optimizing business workflows, it is important to consider the technical constraints of the available integration tools.

Read Limitations

Read utilizes a tiered structure for its integrations: basic functions are included in the free plan, while more advanced features are only available in the Pro, Enterprise, and Enterprise+ plans. This can be a hurdle for teams not opting for higher-cost plans.

Tactiq Limitations

The technical information regarding Tactiq's integrations is not completely detailed in its public documentation. This makes it difficult to accurately assess its actual capabilities and limitations.

Comparison of Restrictions

These limitations have a direct impact on teams' ability to implement integrated solutions efficiently. Therefore, it is essential to analyze the specific needs of each organization and compare them with the options these tools offer.

Conclusion

In the previous sections, we have seen how integrations play a key role in optimizing workflows in companies. According to the analysis, Read offers well-documented and easy-to-implement integrations, thanks to its open API. This allows teams to automate processes and create custom connections with various platforms.

In contrast, the information about Tactiq's integration capabilities is limited, making it difficult to fully evaluate its functionalities. Therefore, Read positions itself as a solid option for teams seeking reliable integrations, always considering the available functionalities based on the subscription plan.

Related posts

• Comparison of note taker Fireflies vs Tactiq: Which offers better value for money?

• Comparison of note taker Otter vs Read: Which is more efficient for taking notes in meetings?

• Comparison of note taker Read vs MeetGeek: Which has better advanced features?