Automating scorecards and briefs is key to saving time and maintaining consistency in the selection processes. Jamy.ai stands out against GoodTime for its customization capability, multilingual support, and advanced automation. Here’s a quick summary:

• Jamy.ai: Customizable templates, automatic language detection (50+ languages), ATS integration, and automatic summary generation and tasks.

• GoodTime: Lacks multilingual support, customizable templates, and summary automation.

Quick Comparison

If you are looking to optimize selection processes with advanced multilingual tools, Jamy.ai is the most comprehensive option.

Main Features

Features of Jamy.ai

These are some of the key functions that Jamy.ai offers to automate scorecards and briefs:

• Customizable Templates: Design specific formats tailored to different types of interviews.

• Language Recognition: Automatically detects and manages conversations in up to 50 languages.

• Automatic Task Distribution: Assigns responsibilities immediately and efficiently.

• ATS Integration: Links reports and scorecards directly with the applicant tracking system for smoother processes.

Create Your Virtual Assistant with ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. AI ...

Scorecard Automation Process

After analyzing its main functions, let's see how Jamy.ai documents and evaluates each interview step by step.

How Jamy.ai Creates the Scorecards

Here’s a breakdown of the process that Jamy.ai follows to automate the creation of scorecards:

• Automatic Audio and Video Recording
  

  The platform starts recording automatically at the beginning of the interview, capturing all content.

• Advanced Processing
  

  The system performs several key tasks, such as:

  • Transcribing the conversation and detecting the language.

  • Generating a detailed summary.

  • Identifying themes and tasks, as well as extracting relevant quotes.

• Scorecard Creation
  

  Once the information is processed, Jamy.ai:

  • Generates a structured report with evaluations and scores.

  • Assigns follow-up tasks to team members.

Comparison of Automation Features

This table allows you to compare the automation capabilities of Jamy.ai against GoodTime, setting the stage to analyze their integration options.

Language and Template Support

After analyzing the automation flow, let's now look at how Jamy.ai handles different formats and supports various languages.

Templates in Jamy.ai

Jamy.ai features a fully customizable template system designed to standardize interview documentation. Users can create scorecards and summaries with predefined sections, evaluation criteria, and custom fields. This ensures that each report aligns with the specific needs of the selection process.

These templates are not only useful, but they also complement the automation process, helping to maintain consistency across all generated documents.

Languages and Content Generation

Jamy.ai automatically identifies the language of the call, generates transcripts and summaries in that language, and allows queries in over 50 languages.

"I have tried several meeting assistants, but Jamy has worked best with the language switch. I work with clients in both Spanish and English, and Jamy automatically detects and reports in the correct language, which is essential for multilingual teams."

• A. Sanchez, Founder at Taiga Floors

Thanks to this adaptability in templates and its multilingual support, Jamy.ai becomes a practical tool for global teams working with selection processes in multiple languages. Unlike Jamy.ai, GoodTime does not offer automatic language detection, automatic summaries, queries in different languages, or customizable templates.

Integration Options with Systems

After analyzing templates and languages, it's time to see how Jamy.ai connects with the tools you use daily.

Integrations of Jamy.ai

Jamy.ai allows you to configure custom webhooks to connect with interview platforms like Google Meet, Zoom, Teams, and Webex, as well as communication and management tools like Slack, Trello, and ATS systems.

These are some of the main integration features:

• Custom Webhooks to connect with your favorite platforms.

• Real-time Synchronization of scorecards and summaries directly with your ATS.

• Automatic Task Creation and Follow-ups at the end of each interview.

Thanks to these integrations, reports are generated, translated, and distributed without interrupting the workflow in the selection processes.

Conclusion

Main Differences

After analyzing templates, languages, and integrations, here are the most important differences:

Advantages of Jamy.ai over GoodTime

Customization and Flexibility

• Completely adjustable templates to design specific formats based on the type of interview.

• Adaptable webhook configuration for custom integrations.

Advanced Multilingual Support
Jamy.ai automatically detects the language of the call and generates reports in the same language, which is ideal for international teams. As A. Sánchez mentions, this feature allows reports to automatically adapt to the detected language, simplifying global communication.

Automation of the Process
Thanks to its integration with webhooks and other tools, Jamy.ai allows automation of workflows, reducing manual tasks and speeding up report delivery. Chris Chaput highlights that this feature has significantly accelerated report delivery by eliminating manual processes.

Guide to Choosing the Right Platform

Consider these factors when deciding if Jamy.ai is the right option for your organization:

• The ability to handle multiple languages.

• The customization of templates according to your needs.

• The automation in report generation and delivery.

• The compatibility with ATS systems.

Related posts

• Jamy.ai vs Metaview: Which is the best AI for taking notes and generating interview reports?

• Jamy.ai vs Hirebee: Which is the best AI solution for evaluating candidates without manual effort?