Are you looking for the best tool to transcribe and summarize interviews? Here’s a quick summary of the key differences between Metaview and Leonar:

• Metaview: Automates scorecards and summaries, automatically detects up to 30 languages, provides real-time transcriptions with 95% accuracy in English and Spanish, and easily integrates with ATS systems like Workday and Greenhouse.

• Leonar: Requires manual setup for languages and scorecards, supports 15 languages, transcribes after uploading the file with 93% accuracy, and includes customizable question banks.

Quick Comparison:

Conclusion: If you are looking for speed, automation, and multilingual support, Metaview is the best choice. If you prefer manual customization and question banks, choose Leonar.

How to Use Read AI to Transcribe and Enhance Your Meetings ...

Scorecards and Briefs Generation

Automation in the creation of evaluations can transform the selection process, making it more agile and efficient. Metaview stands out by automatically generating scorecards right after each recording. These include scores for key competencies and structured briefs, all without the need for manual intervention. On the other hand, Leonar offers a more manual approach: it provides editable scorecard templates, where users must select the criteria and manually activate the creation of summaries.

Now, let’s see how they compare in terms of transcription quality and language support.

Transcription Quality and Language Support

Metaview and Leonar approach transcription in different ways. Here we analyze their language compatibility and performance, key aspects that influence the accuracy of the text, automatic scores, and generated summaries.

Supported Languages

• Metaview:

  • Automatically detects up to 30 languages.

  • Includes English, Spanish, German, French, and Mandarin.

  • Automatically switches between languages during the interview.

• Leonar:

  • Allows manual selection among 15 main languages.

  • Supports English, Spanish, Portuguese, and French.

  • Requires configuring the language before starting.

Speed and Accuracy

• Metaview:

  • Provides real-time transcriptions.

  • Achieves accuracy of approximately 95% in English and Spanish.

  • Processes multiple channels simultaneously.

• Leonar:

  • Performs transcription after uploading the file.

  • Maintains an accuracy close to 93% even in noisy environments.

  • Processes files sequentially.

With this data in mind, we continue with the comparison of specific tools for recruiters.

Tools and Features for Recruiters

These functionalities go beyond simple transcriptions and reports, offering solutions that optimize the daily work of recruiters.

Interview Summarization Tools

Both Metaview and Leonar have modules designed to generate summaries after each interview. These tools highlight the most important points from the conversations. Metaview creates automatic summaries with timestamps and highlighted responses, while Leonar offers summary templates that can be adjusted according to the needs of each department.

Now let’s see how these platforms handle reminders and associated tasks.

Task Management

In selection processes with a high volume of candidates, planning and tracking tasks is key. Both platforms facilitate this management, although with different approaches. Metaview sends automatic reminders based on predefined milestones, which simplifies tracking. On the other hand, Leonar allows each reminder to be manually set up, giving the user more control over alerts.

Highlighted Features of Each Platform

Each tool offers specific features that adapt to different stages of the recruitment process. Metaview includes a customizable dashboard and a historical record of interviews with advanced filters to facilitate searching. Leonar, on the other hand, incorporates question banks designed for each role and the ability to export data in CSV format, ideal for external analysis.

Connections with ATS and HR Systems

Integrating platforms with ATS systems streamlines profile management and avoids duplicates. Each tool offers different ways to connect, optimizing the workflow in recruitment.

Integration List

Metaview:

• Workday: Bidirectional synchronization via REST API.

• Greenhouse: Automatic profile updates using webhooks.

• Lever: Scheduled export in CSV format.

• SAP SuccessFactors: Direct connection with the recruitment module.

Leonar:

• Oracle Recruiting Cloud: Real-time synchronization via REST API.

• iCIMS: Automatic candidate updates via webhooks.

• SmartRecruiters: Integrated connection with the interview panel.

• Jobvite: Automated data export in CSV format.

Integration Comparison

Metaview:

• Designed for direct integrations with enterprise ATS.

• Offers configurable webhooks for real-time updates.

• Includes a documented API for advanced customizations.

Leonar:

• Focused on automatic data synchronization.

• Provides preconfigured connectors for the most used ATS.

• Allows scheduling report exports.

Having tools that integrate easily with existing systems is key to maintaining a centralized and efficient selection process. Both Metaview and Leonar offer solutions that simplify candidate and interview management.

Advantages of the Jamy.ai Platform

In addition to the integrations offered by Metaview and Leonar, Jamy.ai stands out for its focus on customization, language support, and advanced automation.

Templates for Interview Reports

Jamy.ai generates specific templates for each type of interview and position, ensuring clear reports tailored to the needs of each role. This allows covering the diversity of styles and requirements in the selection processes.

Multilingual Support

The platform automatically identifies the language of the call and produces transcriptions, summaries, and queries in over 50 languages, facilitating collaboration in international teams [2]. This positions it above other tools with more limited language options.

I have tried several meeting assistants, but Jamy.ai detects the language in real time and generates the correct report. It is essential for multilingual teams. – A. Sánchez, Founder of Taiga Floors

Integrations with ATS Systems

Through customized webhooks, Jamy.ai automates processes by connecting with calendars, emails, and task management systems, efficiently synchronizing recruitment systems [3]. This completes the automation flow when integrating with your ATS.

Conclusion

Jamy.ai stands out as a prominent tool in the field of interview automation, processing over 500,000 minutes monthly, automatically identifying more than 50 languages, and offering direct integration with any ATS system. These features translate into greater efficiency and accuracy for recruitment teams.

A clear example of its usefulness comes from a satisfied client:

I have tried several meeting assistants, but Jamy.ai detects the language in real time and generates the correct report. It is essential for multilingual teams. – A. Sánchez, Founder of Taiga Floors

Thanks to its automatic language detection, reports are generated immediately and in the appropriate language. Additionally, its integration with ATS systems simplifies and speeds up the entire workflow in selection processes [2].

After evaluating various tools, Jamy.ai stands out as a comprehensive solution for interview automation. If you want to explore more about its features, check the section "Advantages of the Jamy.ai platform" [3].

Related posts

• Jamy.ai vs Metaview: Which is the best AI for taking notes and generating interview reports?

• Jamy.ai vs Leonar: Which interview transcription and summary tool offers more automation?